Sunday, April 24, 2011

Causes of cervical cancer and effective treatments

The recent high-profile death of Jade Goody, British reality show star, from cervical cancer, has increased public awareness of this deadly disease.

Cervical cancer takes the lives of about 253,500 women worldwide each year, according to the National Cervical Cancer Coalition (NCCC). This threat has made ​​a concerted effort to research the causes of cervical cancer and effective treatments for the lastYears.

The researchers found that a virus called Human Papillomavirus (HPV) caused at least 70% of cervical cancers. Following this discovery, they have a vaccine that they claim to protect girls aged between 11 and 26, developed by two common strains of HPV.

Also, while not actually cause cervical cancer, there are factors that increase the risk of disease,. These risk factors:

The long-term use of birthPills: Birth control pills for more than 4 years of infection can increase the risk of cervical cancer in women with HPV.
No routine examination: cervical cancer is more common in women who do not have regular Pap tests.
HPV infection: HPV that cause cervical cancer can not be eliminated entirely in some women. Because these viruses are transmitted through sexual contact, increases the risk of HPV infection with the number ofSexual partners.
Smoking: Tobacco smoke increases the risk of cervical cancer in women with HPV infection.
Weakened immune system: HIV infection or use of drugs that suppress the immune system, increases the risk of cervical cancer.

The knowledge of the causes of cervical cancer and risk factors can help women, the disease.

However, when a woman is diagnosed with cervical cancer was, she faces a difficult Decision. Which treatment is most effective? What treatment should you choose?

treatment of cancer is a very controversial issue, as soon as you venture outside the mainstream medical authorities in the field of alternative medicine. There are good reasons for such intense controversy. In its simplest form, the conflict between freedom of information and self-interest (profit).

The health sector is in one million dollars a year in the United States.> The treatment of cancer was an estimated revenue of $ 72100000000 in 2004, according to the National Cancer Institute. E 'naive hope that a profitable industry, these public interests its own interests first.

In fact, according to a recent "60 Minutes" documentary, there are twice as many lobbyists on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry, as well as members of Congress. They are paid to promote the support of the legislatureLegislation protecting the interests of producers of the drug, and to discredit alternative cancer treatments, in the media.

alternative treatments and cures for cancer have been demonstrated amply documented in recent years, a hundred. Unfortunately, much of this information is deliberately suppressed or discredited because they are a threat to the interests who profit from the patented treatments.

While it is beyond the scope of thisArticles about alternative cancer treatments specific discussion, here are some general guidelines, the research will help you find the information that applies to your personal and educational.

First, you must be willing to be your authority. It's your health and life, after all, and you are entitled to the final decision about the treatment that receive.The access the information you need to do your best position to make a real informationChoice.

Second, you must be willing to look beyond mainstream sources usually if you really want to find the information that is suppressed.

Thirdly, it must therefore include the criteria for the selection of anecdotal evidence, because it will never be FDA-approved studies, double-blind, to support a treatment that can not be patented, or administered by a substantial profit.

The answer is red to discredit alternative treatments of any kind: "There isno clinical evidence that proves it works. "While this is true, is misleading. It does not mean that the treatment does not work. There is no clinical evidence because there was no clinical trials, and you can never, because most of the alternatives can not be patented. So there is no incentive to pay for clinical trials.

Anecdotal, successful person, alternative cancer therapies, new directions and opportunities to visit the first offer.In-depth research of the most liberal countries often support these products and help you make informed decisions that healing can bring success, including cancer.

No comments:

Post a Comment